tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.comments2023-05-09T21:30:20.789+05:30Testing NookUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger143125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-89550069926192051092017-09-29T10:23:47.502+05:302017-09-29T10:23:47.502+05:30Amazing article! I was confused about QTP Trainin...Amazing article! I was confused about <a href="http://qtptraining.co.in/" rel="nofollow"> QTP Training in Chennai </a>, but now got a clear view of the definition. Appreciate your hard work!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07028494509178589304noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-54677922833922992502013-11-14T09:56:11.594+05:302013-11-14T09:56:11.594+05:30Hi Mohit,
After reading your experience about sea...Hi Mohit,<br /><br />After reading your experience about search engines, I have come to the following conclusion:<br /><br />* As End user, I'll vote for yahoo which serves my request irrespective of the method (GET/POST) used.<br /><br />* As Developer, I'll vote for Google because POST is used for submitting some data to the server and not for retrieving data (GET is used for this purpose). And google is throwing the proper error message to end user. But end user who doesn't know about HTTP methods will get confused by getting the error message.<br /><br />* As Tester, It depends on situation and scenarios. Google is throwing proper error message, so its ok.<br />Bing search plugin is not able to serve the search request so its redirecting to Bing Search homepage so that End user can search again (Now you cannot change the HTTP method) and it will serve the request successfully. So Bing is also OK.<br />But Yahoo is not bothered about the HTTP method and gives the result. So I think Yahoo's search engine should be tested properly. There may be some defect, or it may be according to their business logic.blackdragon//https://gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05740222092317255758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-48349754552605487742013-11-10T17:13:46.339+05:302013-11-10T17:13:46.339+05:30@Ravisuriya - Happy you find it useful.
Regards,...@Ravisuriya - Happy you find it useful.<br /><br />Regards,<br />Mohit VermaMohithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13300244649825642497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-51005383439853155852013-11-10T10:57:47.971+05:302013-11-10T10:57:47.971+05:30Hi Mohit,
Thanks for the accessibility series po...Hi Mohit,<br /><br /><br />Thanks for the accessibility series posts. It has been a quick reference for me, when I need info about it.<br /><br /><br />RavisuriyaRavisuriyanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-65385093315748772442013-07-03T12:48:37.590+05:302013-07-03T12:48:37.590+05:30Hi Nakul,
This is correct. There is one more diff...Hi Nakul,<br /><br />This is correct. There is one more difference - the xpath of both the controls are different. <br /><br />I am happy that you really put the efforts to crack the mystery. Keep the good work continue :)<br /><br />Regards,<br />Mohit Verma Mohithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13300244649825642497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-52704936156478767412013-07-03T03:34:45.607+05:302013-07-03T03:34:45.607+05:30Thanks Mohit for replying..
My previous comment w...Thanks Mohit for replying..<br /><br />My previous comment was <br />"It works with your OR but when I tried to create a new OR with same properties it threw error. there is something magical in your OR that is differentiating these two objects. Whats that? tried so many times but couldnt find.<br />please tell the answer."<br /><br />As you asked to do, I exported OR in xml format and I could see "source_index" property is diff for both fields( it is 31 and 36). Also this is hidden so cant be seen in OR.<br /><br />Is it the correct answer? Please let me know..<br />Thanks Again!<br />Looking for a new challange and a new lesson<br />- Nakul GuptaNakul Guptanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-20483935481908345752013-07-02T14:34:22.284+05:302013-07-02T14:34:22.284+05:30Dear Anonymous,
First, apologies for late respons...Dear Anonymous,<br /><br />First, apologies for late response, for some reasons I missed your comments.<br /><br />Second, Thanks for accepting the challenge. I could understand that you really got involved with this to solve the puzzle.<br /><br />Now, there is nothing magical about this OR. It's just a simple OR. I would suggest you to export this OR in to xml format, you might unwrap the secret.<br /><br />Btw, which QTP version you are using?<br /><br />Last request, please publish your name.<br /><br />Regards,<br />Mohit VermaMohithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13300244649825642497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-26953863284346420832013-06-25T14:36:12.374+05:302013-06-25T14:36:12.374+05:30Its throwing an error, Could you please let us kno...Its throwing an error, Could you please let us know what is the solution?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-87885676217146520832013-06-25T14:35:06.409+05:302013-06-25T14:35:06.409+05:30not able to identify the objects. Its trowing an e...not able to identify the objects. Its trowing an error. Could you please let us know whatis the solution? <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-78355138791889292572013-06-21T07:59:34.460+05:302013-06-21T07:59:34.460+05:30It works with your OR but when I tried to create a...It works with your OR but when I tried to create a new OR with same properties it threw error. there is something magical in your OR that is differentiating these two objects. Whats that? tried so many times but couldnt find.<br />please tell the answer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-53129583734113045562013-06-18T11:05:29.756+05:302013-06-18T11:05:29.756+05:30I found that QTP is throwing an error as both of t...I found that QTP is throwing an error as both of the objects having unique description.Its not able to identify the objects correctly.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-86295359498687591942013-05-24T12:49:26.868+05:302013-05-24T12:49:26.868+05:30I am really impressed with the content you provide...I am really impressed with the content you provided. It's really helpful for me and I'm sure for others as well. Keep it up.<br /><a href="http://www.buraq-technologies.com" rel="nofollow"> website design</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-82771048966146889732013-05-22T10:50:52.549+05:302013-05-22T10:50:52.549+05:30Hi Mohit, Very good and informative post.Keep doin...Hi Mohit, Very good and informative post.Keep doing good work.<br />With Thanks,<br />Sreedhar KUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17495367016765774766noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-38049254422825257462013-05-21T11:19:01.104+05:302013-05-21T11:19:01.104+05:30Hi Mohit, This is one of the best article I read i...Hi Mohit, This is one of the best article I read in recent times. Hope many good articles like this from you. Thanks&Regards,SreedharK.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17495367016765774766noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-68602997685934079422013-04-03T01:31:41.542+05:302013-04-03T01:31:41.542+05:30Hi Mohit,
I think it's good that more and mor...Hi Mohit,<br /><br />I think it's good that more and more people are starting to question the (relatively meaningless) term "best practice".<br /><br />You give good examples as to why something might not be a best practice <b>for you</b>.<br /><br />I wrote a somewhat similar post in my own blog last year, titled <a href="http://pro-testing.arabuusimiehet.com/archives/354" rel="nofollow">Standards and Best Practices in Testing</a>.Petteri Lyytinenhttp://pro-testing.arabuusimiehet.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-35078070339261087472013-04-01T02:30:20.502+05:302013-04-01T02:30:20.502+05:30@Unknown
Thanks for sharing the important informat...@Unknown<br />Thanks for sharing the important information. It was a great learning and very crucial feedback for me. <br /><br />Apologies for my selection of words; I will be more careful from next time.Mohithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13300244649825642497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-39912650606726529712013-03-31T22:14:22.553+05:302013-03-31T22:14:22.553+05:30Good article, but there are comments I would like ...Good article, but there are comments I would like to add: <br /><br />- "Single class of users suffering with aural disabilities." We don't like the words "suffering" - we do not suffer from our disabilities, but from physical and attitudinal barriers of society.<br /><br />- Videos need to be BOTH captioned and transcripts for various reasons including but not limited to: slow mobile bandwidths to watch a video, issues with video controls, some people wanting to skim text than to listen to audio, etc.<br /><br />- Accessible media players also have to include captioning support. For example, Vimeo does not have it despite of complaints of many people (both hearing and deaf) for 5 years about the need for it.<br /><br />- Closed captions are better for online not just because it's easier to turn them on/off, but also because it improves searchability. However, open captioning is required for public events like movies in theaters, conferences, etc. Deaf people do not want to carry or use extra equipments to enable captions at public events.<br /><br />As someone with profound hearing loss using captioning, I also advocate for it and have information about it on my website - www.audio-accessibility.com.<br /><br />BTW, CAPTCHAs are not very accessible or user-friendly.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13631918061156362367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-29123932487361722232013-03-28T23:35:45.323+05:302013-03-28T23:35:45.323+05:30Thank you Jyothi for the kind words; it's unus...Thank you Jyothi for the kind words; it's unusual but valuable feedback. It's learning phase and I still need to learn a lot; for example, the way you write.Mohithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13300244649825642497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-62950424908526529982013-03-28T18:11:13.578+05:302013-03-28T18:11:13.578+05:30Thank you Mohit for introducing me to a whole new ...Thank you Mohit for introducing me to a whole new way of observing from the prespective of a differently abled. <br />Your thinking and observation skills are worthy of a mention. It shows you care for your customers in ways that must not be ignored. Congratulations for receiving the value award :)<br />Jyothihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04608897017184726570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-79136794521218623192013-03-14T23:30:29.234+05:302013-03-14T23:30:29.234+05:30Happy you liked it and found it thoughtful.
Happy you liked it and found it thoughtful.<br />Mohithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13300244649825642497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-30999030566124060982013-03-14T23:06:48.267+05:302013-03-14T23:06:48.267+05:30Here's some food for thought.
Thanks for posti...Here's some food for thought.<br />Thanks for posting this Mohit. Jyothihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04608897017184726570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-45078925653791906932013-03-12T12:13:07.492+05:302013-03-12T12:13:07.492+05:30Hi Juliana,
Thanks for appreciating the article a...Hi Juliana,<br /><br />Thanks for appreciating the article and featuring it on <a href="http://www.superb.net/blog/" rel="nofollow">Superb Internet's blog</a>. It’s an honour.<br /><br />I believe that one can learn by interacting with others. Thanks for taking the initiative - I will surely let you know with my finding on software testing.<br /><br />Regards,<br />Mohit VermaMohithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13300244649825642497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-60043968553409008292013-03-12T06:08:49.972+05:302013-03-12T06:08:49.972+05:30Hey Mohit, Thank you for the really simple counter...Hey Mohit, Thank you for the really simple counter-argument of the .gov's website on all text usability. I agree with you, it's kinda boring and going the wrong direction, I featured your article here on <a href="http://www.superb.net/blog/2013/03/12/are-you-hosting-a-dynamic-website/" rel="nofollow">Superb Internet's blog</a>. Any further tests you want to let me know about and share some insight do let me knowJulianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00834401196512005151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-76957405877825102262013-03-08T17:09:28.822+05:302013-03-08T17:09:28.822+05:30@hosted phone system - Neither I have any doubt on...@hosted phone system - Neither I have any doubt on what you said, nor was this post intended to make any judgmental decision over brand Nokia. The post is simply based on my experience with my phone.Mohithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13300244649825642497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760333663618613093.post-563273718695344092013-03-08T13:46:15.642+05:302013-03-08T13:46:15.642+05:30nokia is still consistent of producing phone model...nokia is still consistent of producing phone models that can compete to other phone brandshosted phone systemhttp://www.ringcentral.com/phone-system/index.htmlnoreply@blogger.com